Let’s have the universal health care debate in California


Calling the Democrats’ new universal health care legislation “bold” is an understatement. It would be a life-changer for practically every Californian.

It also would require by far the largest state tax increase in history.

Some powerful opponents will call it “socialist.” But aren’t Social Security and Medicare socialist? And they’re among the most popular government programs in America.

Some supporters are hailing it as a California version of federal “Medicare for all.” But really it’s Medicare for nobody. Californians on Medicare would be shifted into the new state-run “CalCare.”

No more Medicare in the nation’s most populous state. Nor Medi-Cal, the California version of Medicaid insurance for poor people. And private health care insurance would essentially be out of business. Everyone would be transferred into CalCare.

As advertised by CalCare proponents, most Californians would be better off under the new state plan: “No premiums, copays or deductibles … or other out-of-pocket costs.”

But more benefits: “Including all primary and preventive care, hospital and outpatient services, prescription drugs, dental, vision, audiology [hearing aids], reproductive health services, maternity and newborn care, long-term services and … mental health and substance abuse treatment, laboratory and diagnostic services, ambulatory services and more.

“Patients will have freedom to choose doctors, hospitals and other providers … without worrying about whether a provider is ‘in-network.’”

The assumption is that Sacramento can manage such a massive endeavor. There’s plenty of reason to be skeptical.

“I look forward to hearing Democrats explain how they plan to successfully take over more than 10% of the state’s economy when in the last decade they’ve proven themselves incapable of simple things like building a railroad, providing clean drinking water, keeping the lights on and filling potholes,” says Assembly Republican Leader Marie Waldron of Valley Center in San Diego County.

Even a major Democratic supporter, Assembly Health Committee Chairman Jim Wood of Healdsburg in Sonoma County, has similar concerns.

“I’ve always been supportive of health care for everyone,” Wood said. “But I have serious and legitimate concerns about how an entity like this would be governed. I just worry whether we have the capacity to manage this.”

One thing is indisputable: Paying for this endeavor would require an unprecedented tax hike — $163 billion annually, according to opponents.

That’s after Washington is talked into surrendering to CalCare all the money the feds currently are spending in California on Medicare, Medicaid and other health care programs.

There’d be a broad array of new taxes on businesses and employees, including personal income taxes — in a state that already has the nation’s highest levies.

Not only that, but future tax hikes to fund CalCare could be approved on a simple majority legislative vote. Any tax increase now requires a two-thirds vote.

“This measure would add to the cost of living in California and lead to job loses,” asserted Robert Gutierrez, president of the California Taxpayers Association. “Californians have been taken to the cleaners before by expensive measures that promised the world but didn’t deliver.”

Like with the bullet train.

Both the CalCare bill, AB 1400, and tax hike constitutional amendment, ACA 11, were introduced by Assemblyman Ash Kalra, D-San Jose, and originated with the politically powerful California Nurses Association.

They contend that even with the higher taxes, Californians would pay less overall and get more benefits because there’d be no need to pony up for insurance company profits.

“We have the most expensive medical system in the world and have the worst outcomes of any industrial nation,” Kalra says. “The bottom line is that the wealthiest state in the wealthiest nation on Earth should join other nations in assuring healthcare for everyone.”

That will require a heap of convincing — not only in the Legislature, but also among the voters, who must approve the tax increases.

Don’t be surprised if the tax legislation is quietly shelved for a while. Not even Democrats are anxious to vote for a tax hike during an election year when they’ll be running in new districts that have just been remapped.

Look for the taxes to be voted on next year. If passed, they’d be placed on the 2024 presidential election ballot when there’ll be a large turnout that traditionally benefits Democratic causes.

But the “single payer” health care bill faces a rush deadline in the Assembly. Under legislative rules, it must be sent to the Senate by Jan. 31. It probably will be. Then there’ll be a battle over final passage in August.

Gov. Gavin Newsom presumably would sign it. But the measure couldn’t take effect until the taxes are approved.

CalCare faces an uphill fight. The odds against it are steep.

But this is a debate worth having — unlike with most bills in Sacramento.

George Skelton is a Los Angeles Times columnist.


Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Yours Headline is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.