Explained: It’s BJP vs BJP in a decades-old boundary dispute | India News

0

The decades-old boundary dispute between Karnataka and Maharashtra over Belagavi has once again flared up with Karnataka CM Basavaraj Bommai training guns at Maharashtra Deputy CM Devendra Fadnavis terming his statement on the issue “provocative”.
Fadnavis had said on Wednesday, “No village in Maharashtra will go to Karnataka! The state government will fight strongly in the Supreme Court to get Marathi speaking villages in Karnataka including Belgaum-Karwar-Nipani!”
Both Bommai and Fadnavis are senior leaders of the BJP.
Maharashtra CM Eknath Shinde has also maintained that no village of Maharashtra will be allowed to merge with any other state.

Belagavi border dispute case between Maharashtra & Karnataka to be heard in SC

Legal course
Earlier this week, the Shinde government in Maharashtra appointed two ministers to coordinate with its legal team regarding the court case on the dispute, which is set to come up in the Supreme Court. Soon, the Bommai government in Karnataka too deployed a battery of top lawyers, including Mukul Rohatgi and Shyam Diwan, to fight its case.
Ongoing politics
Bommai earlier claimed that the Panchayats in Jath Taluka in Sangli district of Maharashtra had passed a resolution in the past to merge with Karnataka when there was a severe drought situation and acute drinking water crisis, and the Karnataka government devised schemes to help them by providing water.
Responding to this, Fadnavis said on Wednesday: “These villages had introduced a resolution on the issue of water scarcity in 2012. Presently, none of the villages have introduced any resolution.”

The dispute
The dispute dates back to the 1960s after the reorganisation of the two states on linguistic lines. Maharashtra laid claim on Belagavi, earlier known as Belgaum, which was part of the Bombay Presidency at the time of independence, on linguistic grounds. Belagavi, bordering Maharashtra, has a significant population of Marathi-speaking people, and has for decades been a bone of contention between the two states. The matter reached the Supreme Court in 2004 and continues to be pending.

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Yours Headline is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.